The nose of the Giza Sphinx is said to have been damaged during a vandalism campaign carried out by soldiers of Napoleon Bonaparte in the early 19th century.
The nose of the Sphinx of Giza is the subject of quite a few historical theories and controversies. Many have long believed that the nose was destroyed by cannonballs from Napoleon Bonaparte's troops during his campaign in Egypt in 1798. However, there is historical evidence that the Sphinx already had a broken nose long before Napoleon arrived in the area—drawings from the 18th century, before the French expedition, clearly show the Sphinx without a nose. Other explanations suggest the idea of an act of vandalism committed by a certain Muhammad Sa'im al-Dahr, an iconoclastic religious figure from the 15th century, who allegedly deliberately destroyed the nose to eliminate local idolatrous practices. Another possibility is natural erosion. Wind, sand, and extreme weather conditions may have gradually weakened and eventually broken the nose, as can be observed on other parts of the monument that have also suffered the ravages of time.
One of the most well-known legends recounts that the nose was broken by a cannonball fired by Napoleon's soldiers during the Egyptian campaign, a story that has proven to be completely false. In reality, drawings made before the arrival of French troops clearly show the Sphinx already deprived of its nose. Another popular explanation claims that it was a 14th-century Muslim religious leader named Muhammad Sa'im al-Dahr who deliberately broke the nose to put an end to idolatrous practices deemed pagan around the monument. This version, whose historical accuracy is not fully confirmed, still circulates widely today in the region. Others say that the nose was destroyed during acts of vandalism or simply lost due to the natural wear of the centuries—in short, no one knows exactly which legend is true, leaving a bit of mystery around the famous face of the Sphinx.
The missing nose of the Sphinx quickly became a strong symbol to illustrate the fragility of cultural and historical heritage. It has left such a mark on people's minds that the figure of the Sphinx with the broken nose has become iconic, recognizable all over the world and featured in many films, cartoons, and comic books. Symbolically, this absent nose has become synonymous with the very idea of ancient mystery, reminding everyone that the past holds certain secrets that are impossible to fully decipher. It is even used as a humorous or ironic example of how monuments traverse history and withstand (or not!) the test of time.
This case is not isolated. Famous monuments often lose pieces due to the effects of time, wars, or human clumsiness. For example, the Venus de Milo statue has long lost both of its arms, likely after a fall or an accident whose exact details are unknown. Another famous example is the destruction of the nose on the statue of Napoleon at the top of the Vendôme column in 1871 during the Paris Commune, a deliberate political symbol rather than mere natural deterioration. In a situation geographically closer to the Sphinx, the carved faces of Coptic art in Egypt have often been mutilated during religious or political changes. In short, the Sphinx is clearly not the only one to have suffered visible and symbolic damage.
The Great Sphinx of Giza measures approximately 73 meters long and 20 meters high, making it the largest known monolithic sculpture in the world to date.
The original beard of the Sphinx, now in fragments and displayed at the British Museum in London, was likely a late addition, perhaps even after the initial construction of the monument.
Originally, the Great Sphinx was painted in bright colors—mainly red and blue, as evidenced by traces found on its face and body during recent archaeological excavations.
The Sphinx of Giza is not the only ancient monument to fall victim to historical vandalism: ancient Greek statues often had their noses intentionally broken during conflicts or to symbolize the dominance of a new power.
Technically, a restoration of the nose is possible, but most specialists and archaeologists oppose this idea. Artificially restoring this monument could permanently alter its historical and cultural authenticity. Today, the focus is on the conservation and preservation of the existing remains.
Yes, many other famous monuments have suffered similar damage. For example, the Venus de Milo and the Winged Victory of Samothrace have lost limbs over time, primarily due to accidents or the natural aging of materials.
The nose, protruding more than the other parts of the Sphinx's face, was a fragile and exposed structure. Moreover, being carved from a limestone that is susceptible to erosion, the nose was naturally more vulnerable to damage caused by time and the elements.
Yes, several accounts from Arab or European travelers dating back to late antiquity or the Middle Ages describe the Sphinx with varying degrees of facial damage. However, the certainly fragmentary representations from before the 15th century generally suggest that the nose had already disappeared before this period.
Although popular tales often attribute the loss of the nose to cannon fire from Napoleon's troops, this story is largely debunked by historians. Drawings predating the Napoleonic era already depict the Sphinx without its nose, suggesting that this damage occurred before the arrival of the French armies in Egypt.
No one has answered this quiz yet, be the first!' :-)
Question 1/5
