Explain why the Hundred Years' War between France and England lasted so long.

In short (click here for detailed version)

The Hundred Years War between France and England lasted so long due to a combination of factors such as dynastic rivalries, territorial claims, and economic conflicts.

Explain why the Hundred Years' War between France and England lasted so long.
In detail, for those interested!

Dynastic instability and contested royal succession

The Hundred Years' War starts notably because the French king Charles IV dies without a direct heir in 1328. His cousin, the English king Edward III, seizes the opportunity by claiming the French crown, asserting that he is the most legitimate descendant. However, the French nobles prefer to see Philip VI of Valois, another cousin, albeit more distantly related, but French and locally supported, ascend to the throne. This family dispute over the throne quickly leads to significant chaos, dragging both kingdoms into an endless period of dynastic uncertainty, competing claims, and power struggles that will extend for decades. With each royal death, the cycle begins anew: new rival claims emerge, and the absence of a clear or lasting agreement only fuels the conflict further.

Territorial objectives and prolonged regional rivalries

The Hundred Years' War drags on because England and France are absolutely determined to control the same key regions, particularly Aquitaine, a territory rich in resources and extremely important commercially. Each side wants to strengthen its local power, expand its influence, or simply prevent the other from gaining too many strategic advantages. These regional rivalries never really cease, unleashing regular tensions that further prolong this endless conflict. Cities, ports, and fertile agricultural lands are always worth fighting for and maintaining claims over, even if it means being stubborn for decades. Territorial ambitions are tough, grudges accumulate, and all of this makes it very difficult for both sides to let go, thus extending the conflict for entire generations.

Military evolutions and tactical resistance of both camps

The Hundred Years' War saw both sides continuously evolve in their manner of fighting. At the beginning, the English dominated thanks to formations of longbowmen, capable of shooting at great distances and piercing enemy armor. As a result, the French gradually adapted their strategy: fewer reckless cavalry charges and more engagements on foot. Over the decades, innovations such as the massive use of the first cannons and gunpowder weapons further changed the game. Each time one army seemed to gain the upper hand, the other side adjusted its tactics, reinforced its defenses, and innovated further, making a definitive victory extremely difficult and prolonging the conflict endlessly.

Economic and social difficulties prolonging the conflict

The war was costing a fortune on both sides of the Channel. Maintaining standing armies with mercenaries and renewing equipment continually required raising heavy taxes, which were unpopular and necessarily limited. Peasants and artisans found themselves crushed under the burden of taxes and saw their harvests regularly pillaged by the passing troops; all this led to popular revolts, such as the famous Jacquerie in France in 1358. The countryside was losing many inhabitants, fields were left abandoned, and famine regularly loomed. These troubles and shortages weakened each country and prevented a swift victory, which prolonged the conflict for generations.

Changing political alliances and complex diplomacy

During the Hundred Years' War, alliances are easily made and broken according to immediate interests. The great nobles do not hesitate to change sides based on the promises or benefits they hope to gain. It's pretty much every man for himself, which makes ending the conflict very difficult. Some dukes, like the Duke of Burgundy, play their own game, alternating alliances with the English and then returning to the French crown when it suits their interests better. These incessant changes complicate negotiations and peace attempts enormously. With each treaty signed, you can count on at least one betrayal not far behind. The diplomats of the time really do not have an easy life as political interests are constantly shifting.

Did you know?

Good to know

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1

How did the Hundred Years' War influence military evolution in Europe?

This conflict promoted the evolution of military tactics and armaments, such as the development of the English longbow, improvements in artillery, and the increasing use of professional soldiers at the expense of traditional feudal troops.

2

What role did Joan of Arc play in the Hundred Years' War?

Joan of Arc played a key role in restoring confidence among the French and turning the military situation around, particularly during the siege of Orléans in 1429. Her intervention allowed King Charles VII to be crowned and contributed to bolstering the morale of the French camp.

3

Why was England claiming the throne of France?

The kings of England claimed the French throne due to their direct descent from the French Capetians through Isabelle of France, wife of King Edward II of England. This dynastic dispute served as the initial pretext for the prolonged conflict.

4

What were the economic consequences of the Hundred Years' War?

The economic consequences were profound: both France and England suffered massive destruction, a demographic crisis linked to war and plague, and heavy military expenditures. This led to poverty, social instability, and lasting economic delays in the affected regions.

5

What are the main events that marked the Hundred Years' War?

Among the major events are the Battle of Crécy in 1346, the Battle of Poitiers in 1356, the French victory led by Joan of Arc during the Siege of Orléans in 1429, and finally the decisive Battle of Castillon in 1453, which marked the end of the war.

History and Culture

No one has answered this quiz yet, be the first!' :-)

Quizz

Question 1/5