Explain why Napoleon Bonaparte was so small?

In short (click here for detailed version)

Napoleon Bonaparte was approximately 1.68 meters tall, which was average for his time. The confusion about his height partly comes from the difference between the old French measurements and modern measurements.

Explain why Napoleon Bonaparte was so small?
In detail, for those interested!

Genetic and familial origins

Napoleon actually had a height close to average for his time, about 1.68 m. Moreover, his Corsican family was not particularly known for being tall: his father, Carlo Bonaparte, had a rather ordinary height, just like most of his relatives. His mother, Letizia, was herself quite short, which surely did not help to pass on particularly tall genes. In short, genetically speaking, Napoleon was not necessarily destined to be very tall, but he certainly was not as short as history (and English propaganda!) would like to make us believe.

Nutrition and living conditions during childhood

Napoleon grew up in Corsica, an island that sometimes had quite limited food resources in the 18th century. His diet was therefore relatively simple, mainly consisting of bread, porridge, local fruits, and some proteins like cheese or salted meat, depending on availability. But nothing extraordinary to encourage good growth. Although his family belonged to a small Corsican nobility, their lifestyle was fairly modest, far from ensuring Napoleon a rich and balanced diet from childhood. These modest conditions and a varied diet may have influenced his growth and explain why he remained slightly shorter than average.

Potential health issues limiting growth

Contrary to what one might think, Napoleon did not really have any serious illness that directly hindered his growth. Some sources do mention that he suffered from sporadic epileptic seizures or recurring minor digestive issues, which were common at that time given the sometimes questionable hygiene. During his youth, he also experienced a few episodes of malnutrition, which may have slightly influenced his final height. But overall, nothing truly alarming or exceptional: he was just a man of slightly below-average stature, not enough to consider him a particular medical case.

Influence of average size and physical norms in the 18th century

In the 18th century, the average height of men in France was around 1.65 meters, which today would seem quite short by modern standards. Napoleon was about 1.68 meters tall, meaning he was within the norm of the time, even slightly above the popular average. The problem lay elsewhere: frequently surrounded by tall officers of the Imperial Guard measuring easily 1.80 meters or more, he inevitably appeared smaller by direct comparison. At that time, physical criteria played a significant role in how powerful or influential individuals were perceived; being tall imposed a presence, an instinctive authority. Aware of this image, Napoleon willingly surrounded himself with powerful symbols or imposing mounts to visually compensate for his actual height.

Role of British propaganda in the perception of its size

The British widely used a satirical caricature mocking Napoleon's height to ridicule him. The English press ironically nicknamed him "Little Boney," producing numerous drawings and engravings where his small stature was deliberately exaggerated. This method was part of a clear strategy: to belittle his physical stature in order to diminish his political and military prestige as well. However, Napoleon was about 1.68 meters tall, a rather average height for that time. This biased perception became widely popularized, even enduringly influencing our modern view of the figure.

Did you know?

Good to know

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1

Did size matter in the military of the 18th century?

Sure! Here’s the translation: "Yes, at that time, a taller stature was often associated with strength and authority. However, Napoleon managed to overcome these prejudices thanks to his exceptional military qualities, charisma, and undeniable leadership on the battlefield."

2

What other famous historical figures were of short stature?

Many famous figures were relatively short, such as Alexander the Great, Pablo Picasso, and Gandhi, demonstrating that historical greatness does not necessarily depend on physical height.

3

Has British propaganda influenced our perception of Napoleon's stature?

Absolutely, British propaganda during the Napoleonic Wars regularly used Napoleon's supposed height as a means of humiliation, contributing to the erroneous popular image of an excessively small and ridiculous Napoleon.

4

What was Napoleon's actual height?

Napoleon was about 1.68 meters tall, which was not particularly short for a man of the 18th century. The reputation for his small stature partly comes from a confusion between the French and British measurements of the time.

5

The expression "Napoleon complex" comes from the idea that some individuals, often shorter in stature, may exhibit overly aggressive or domineering behavior as a compensatory mechanism for their height. The term suggests that these individuals might feel a need to prove themselves, drawing a parallel to the historical figure of Napoleon Bonaparte, who was often thought to be of short stature.

The expression 'Napoleon complex' refers to the popular idea that a short man compensates for his feelings of inferiority through excessive authority or aggressive behavior. However, there is no historical evidence that Napoleon personally suffered from such a complex.

History and Culture : Historical Figures

0% of respondents passed this quiz completely!

Quizz

Question 1/5